Backblaze vs crashplan for mac7/22/2023 I guess once everything is uploaded, I'll try to download a few folders and see how long it takes. Now, the only question is download speeds. But that means I can back up each show just a few hours, so if anything happens to my hard drive before I can get the final product to the client and delete it, my ass is covered. I usually end up with 10 - 100 GB of data per event (depending on how long and how many cameras and/or audio tracks). If I just had the music, apps, documents, and family photos that an average user has, I would be done in less than a day.īut since I do photography, videography, and audio recording, I have a lot of data coming in. However, even without knowing the exact transfer rate, I can tell it's going a lot faster than Crashplan was - it's backed up more than 117 GB the 4.5 hours since I started it. Thanks for the explanation! It makes sense, although I wish it would give more of a true speed. That said Crashplan is nice too! I refer people to them whenever we can't meet their needs. That drive then dies, and we don't have that data uploaded. We've seen it happen where folks have a lot of externals and so they disconnect them from their computer, plug it in to another computer, add some stuff, then forget about it. We require seeing data once per 30 days so that we can check both: 1) our backup of your data for errors 2) to make sure that there is no additional data on that drive ). We can definitely saturate networks though, so make sure you're still able to like, stream Netflix and stuff while the backups are occurring. It's mostly intended just to give a quick general indication of how quickly you're uploading. That calculation is pretty rudimentary, basically we're testing a random thread for speed and then multiplying by the available threads selected. Yev from Backblaze here -> I can weigh in a bit on why you may be seeing a super high upload speed in the speedtest within the Backblaze app. So, what are your opinions on the two programs? I don't mind paying the extra money for and waiting the extra time for uploading with Crashplan if it's a better investment, but if no one thinks it's that superior, I'll just go with Backblaze. Right now, Backblaze is winning me over with its upload speeds (and its cheaper price), but I guess none of that matters if it ends up being inferior when it comes to things like security, customer service, and most importantly, restores. I want to make the right choice once the trials are over. However, I'm not sure how accurate this is - how could I have a file uploaded at 188 Mbps when my upload speed shown through speed tests is 1/3 of that at most?Īnyway, I would like to know anyone's experiences with these two programs in the long run. It says I'm averaging 419 GB a day, which is amazing for someone like me with 1.5 TB of files (3-4 days to upload everything, where as Crash Plan has only uploaded 48 GB in the last 16 hours). Now the "last file transfer speed" is showing 20 Mbps at a minimum, and I've seen it go as high as 188 Mbps! (I would say most of the ones I see hover around 100 Mbps). But then I set the manual throttle to max, and set the number of backup threads to 10. With the default settings, I was getting similar results to Crashplan. It shows you the "last file transfer speed". So, then I downloaded the free trial of Backblaze to compare. It just seemed like it was a really low fraction of my actual upload speed (speed tests show 30-60 Mbps). I even have it set up to use up to 100% of the CPU. but I am only getting between 500 Kbps and a max of around 10 Mbps upload speed. I downloaded the free trial of Crashplan, expecting great results. Crashplan seemed to be the favorite, and I particularly liked it because it has unlimited file retention - I could not have to have my external hard drives connected, and it would still save a copy of the files (Backblaze only keeps them for 30 days). Does anyone have experience with Crashplan and/or Backblaze on a Mac? Preferably someone who has tried both, but input from either side would be appreciated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |